Search Results for “2024 Newest SHRM SHRM-SCP Test Vce Free 🩺 Go to website { www.pdfvce.com } open and search for ▷ SHRM-SCP ◁ to download for free 👓SHRM-SCP New Dumps Book”

Transition to Clinical Practice
2020
Coakley, Niamh
University College Cork

Background: According to extensive international research, medical graduates continue to face significant challenges as they transition from student to doctor. Contributory factors include issues with preparedness, support, workplace interactions and challenges to their health and wellbeing. While research to date, in the form of attitudinal information, and common qualitative themes, has afforded us some insight into this formative period, a contemporaneous exploration of the lived experience of transition to practice is lacking. To improve work readiness and ease the transition, focused interventions have been designed and implemented; however, an overview of the research activity into these interventions is also lacking. My thesis aims to address these gaps by achieving a deeper understanding and appreciation of the experience of the first year of practice, by exploring the lived experience of anticipation of practice, the experience over the first year and the experience of intra-professional mistreatment. I will also describe the evidence for interventions to support these doctors.

Methodology: For my longitudinal exploration of the lived experience of the transition, I used the contemporary phenomenological approach of interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA), which aligns with my interpretivist/constructivist worldview. The methodological frameworks and guidelines of Arksey and O’Malley, Levac and the Joanna Briggs Institute informed my scoping review of the literature into transitional interventions.

Methods: I purposively recruited 14 recent medical graduates. I interviewed them prior to commencing work, regarding their experience of anticipation of practice, and again at the end of their first year with respect to their experience of transition over the year. Each participant recorded audio diaries during the year relating to their experiences. Interviews were recorded, and all data was transcribed verbatim and anonymised. Analysis was carried out using IPA to identify common themes in respect of my research questions. To explore the experience of intra-professional mistreatment during the transition I focused on the data of a subset of three participants. For my scoping review, I assembled a research team of experts. Using relevant terms, we searched Medline Ovid, Embase, PsycInfo, SocIndex, ERIC and CINAHL databases, handsearched key journals, and tracked citations to identify empirical papers describing the implementation and/or evaluation of interventions designed to address preparedness for practice. Papers were screened by abstract and title and then by full text using inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data was extracted to address the focus of the review.

Results: The experience of anticipation of transition was characterised by the expectation of an abrupt transition, mixed feelings regarding commencing practice and strategic planning in anticipation of the challenges ahead. The hidden curriculum shaped participants’ understanding of what was expected of them and inspired dysfunctional strategies to meet these expectations. I identified overlapping stages in the experience over the first year. An initial emotional response, similar to the ‘transition shock’ described in newly graduated nurses was followed by an increase in confidence, challenges with workload, support and workplace interactions, and a final stage of rationalisation of the challenges encountered during the year. Distressing experiences of victimisation, disrespect and issues securing support from more senior doctors were described, which inspired some maladaptive behaviours. My scoping review revealed a lack of emphasis on real-patient care experiences, on the wellbeing of the graduate, or involvement of allied healthcare professionals, and a lack of standardisation regarding categorisation and terminology used to describe transitional interventions, with low level study design and evaluation.

Discussion: While the abrupt nature of the transition characterised the early experience of commencing work, beyond this, cultural, relational and contextual factors predominated. One way to alleviate the abrupt nature of the transition is to strengthen experience based learning as an undergraduate so that the role of senior medical student approximates that of newly qualified doctor. There is also a need for greater accommodation of the early transition period at organisational level. Deep cultural change is required to address the hidden curriculum and mitigate its negative effects. Interventions to address bullying and harassment, suboptimal supervision, issues with inter-professional collaboration and increased work intensity are also vital to improve the experience of transition to clinical practice. My findings have added to the extant knowledge relating to the transition to clinical practice and will inform undergraduate and postgraduate curricula and interventions to support this important period in the lives of medical graduates.

Journal

International Journal of Bullying Prevention

The Centre hosts the International Journal of Bullying Prevention (Springer) which is a peer reviewed scholarly publication issued four times per year.

This peer reviewed journal provides an interdisciplinary scientific forum in which to publish current research on the causes, forms, and multiple contexts of bullying and cyberbullying as well as evolving best practice in identification, prevention, and intervention. Noting that bullying may occur at schools, universities, communities, the workplace, and/or online – and that cyberbullying can subsume sexting, digital dating abuse, sextortion, and doxing – the journal welcomes empirical, theoretical, and review papers on a broad range of issues, populations, and domains.

Editors-in-Chief:
Prof. James O’Higgins Norman (DCU)
Prof. Sameer Hinduja (Florida Atlantic University)

Managing Editors:
Dr. Angela Mazzone (DCU)
Dr. Sebastian Wachs (University of Potsdam)
Dr. Michelle Wright (Penn State University)

Biphobia in sport: sexual identity and exclusionary practices
2013
Maddocks, Katherine Louise
Brunel University

Research in the field of bisexuality has identified that bisexuals experience a unique kind of phobia, in that phobic responses to their sexual preferences appear from both mainstream and LGBT communities. However, little research in the UK has been conducted within the arena of sport culture to cater for the particular welfare needs of bisexual athletes. As an additional consequence, there is little theorisation of bisexuality available within the context of sport sociology. This research contributes to debates in the politics of identity by exploring a fairly new landscape within sport culture using a Foucauldian analysis of power. Discourse analyses have been utilised to interpret thirteen semi-structured interviews conducted with British athletes on the topics of bi-invisibility and the general problem of homophobia. This research also contributes to discussions concerning the mobilisation of power through discourse – certain discursive practices function to legitimize normative over non-normative sexualities and queer/fluid/bisexual identities are further stigmatized and othered. The main findings suggest that exclusions are mobilised most effectively, ironically, through sport cultural practices of inclusion, in that they are almost exclusively sexual identity-based. Additionally, this study offers a theoretical explanation for the peripheralisation of bisexuality in sport culture which can shed new light on bisexual theory in mainstream culture. It makes important suggestions as to the new directions future research can take in order to advance the current knowledge bases concerning the effects of bantering. This research proposes that practices of bantering can be just as marginalising as those of bullying. In the resultant climate of covert exclusions, organizational sporting bodies could benefit from paying close attention to the disempowering effects of biphobic and homophobic language, whether humorously intended or otherwise. This is with particular respect to youth footballing academies and spectator communities.

KiDiCoTi: Kids Digital Lives in Covid-19 Times: A Comparative Mixed Methods Study on Digital Practices, Safety and Wellbeing

DCU’s National Anti-Bullying Research and Resource Centre in partnership with the Joint Research Centre of the European Commission undertook a study on the experiences of Irish children and families during the Covid-19 lockdown.

Access the KiDiCoTi report here.

UNESCO Chair

UNESCO Chair

About the UNESCO Chair

The UNESCO Chair on Bullying and Cyberbullying, the first such Chair in the world, was awarded to Professor James O’Higgins Norman at Dublin City University in 2018. The UNESCO Chairs programme advances research and education in all of UNESCO’s fields of competence by building university networks and encouraging inter-varsity cooperation through transfer of knowledge across borders. Professor O’Higgins Norman, with other members of the Chair, conducts a programme of research within and supported by DCU Anti-Bullying Centre (ABC) that spans a range of global partnerships involving universities, NGOs, Governments, schools and youth organisations. This work encompasses research, education, and policy development.

Background

Professor O’Higgins Norman is a member of the Government of Ireland’s Steering Committee on School Bullying and has contributed to the development of two national action plans on bullying in 2013 and 2022. He is also a member of the Government of Ireland’s National Advisory Council on Online Safety (NACOS) and was previously a member of the National Council for Curriculum and Assessment Sub-Committee on Intercultural Education in Schools. James is Chair of UNESCO’s International Scientific Committee on Tackling Bullying and lead the development of UNESCO’s Whole Education Approach to Tackling School Bullying and Cyberbullying. He was Chair of World Anti-Bullying Forum 2019. He has lead several Government and EU funded research projects on school bullying, inclusion and diversity. He is the Principal Investigator on an EU COST Action focused on migration and school bullying. James is the PI on three industry funded research projects worth over €5 million developing educational and digital solutions to bullying and cyberbullying. In 2021 Professor O’Higgins Norman received the President’s Award for Research Impact.

Mission

The Chair is ideally located within DCU Anti-Bullying Centre which is a globally connected university designated centre of excellence for anti-bullying and online safety research and education. In line with the Centre, the Chair shares the same purpose, vision, values and spirit as follows:

Purpose

To transform the lives of people and global societies through promoting positive social relationships.

Vision

To be a globally recognised centre for innovative research and education in anti-bullying and online safety.

Values

Excellence in research and education is the foundation of what we do. We are guided by our values of integrity and respect; we act with compassion and foster a global culture of inclusion and collaboration.

Spirit

We are united by our purpose and the mutual support from our global community to achieve our aims. We take pride in our ethical way of working and the positive social impact our research has on tackling bullying and promoting online safety. We believe our spirit will flourish because we are ethical, ambitious, collaborative, compassionate and committed to improving well-being in society.

The Spectrum of Inclusive Practice for Pupils with Autism Attending Mainstream Primary Schools
2019
McElroy, Colin
Trinity College Dublin

The experiences and attitudes of inclusion for pupils with autism attending mainstream primary schools and relevant stakeholders in Leinster were ascertained through the use of questionnaires, interviews, focus groups, visual methodology and documentary analysis. Eight primary schools participated in this research and each school had access to a special class for pupils with autism. This study looked at the impact of inclusive policies on the provision of supports and services for pupils with autism and their overall learning and social experiences in each school. The findings of this research highlight many positive elements of good practice in each school. It was apparent throughout this research that professionals in schools were committed to enhancing the learning and social experiences for pupils with autism. The importance of positive home-school relationships was identified, as positive relationships greatly influenced the outcomes for young children with autism. The majority of teachers, principals and SNAs would like to see more opportunities regarding continuous professional development to accommodate the diverse needs of pupils presenting in schools on the autism spectrum. Evidence in this study highlighted inconsistencies in practice and mixed experiences for all stakeholders across each school environment. Findings from this study suggest that schools are working within a policy vacuum that is negatively impacting on the learning and social experiences for pupils with autism. In this research, the majority of parents had difficulty accessing adequate clinical and educational supports. Many parents do not have access to a special class in their locality, which can cause isolation and loneliness for their children locally. Most schools had exclusionary clauses in enrolment policies that made school choice difficult for parents. There was overwhelming consensus from parents and professionals that mixed ability special classes are not viable and the current structure, purpose and role of the special class needs to be revised in that regard. Mixed experiences were reported from parents regarding their children transferring between schools. The transfer from primary to post-primary was a great source of anxiety for the majority of parents of children with autism. This research suggests that inclusive policies must be implemented to provide adequate resource provision and requisite funding to enhance the learning and social experiences for all pupils with autism attending mainstream primary schools.

International Journal of Bullying Prevention: Special Issue on The Legacy of Dan Olweus

The International Journal of Bullying Prevention has a special issue published in memory of Prof. Dan Olweus.

Dan Olweus, a founder of research on bullying, died September 29th, 2020, at his home in Bærum, Norway, at the age of 89. He was born April 18th, 1931, in Nässjö, Sweden, and trained in psychology at the University of Stockholm. Olweus obtained his PhD in 1969, studying aggressive behavior among young boys. He moved to Norway and the University of Bergen in 1970, as a Professor of Psychology (until 1995) and Research Professor (1996 to 2010). He worked at the Regional Centre for Child and Youth Mental Health and Child Welfare from 2010 until 2016. Olweus was affiliated with the Department for Health Promotion and Development at the University of Bergen from 2019 until his death.

In 1970, Olweus conducted what is widely considered as the first scientific study on bullying, with 900 boys in Solna, Sweden. The findings were published in his book, ‘Aggression in Schools: Bullies and Whipping Boys (1978)’. In 1982, three adolescents died by suicide in Norway after having been severely bullied and these events, together with Olweus’ research, led to the First National Campaign against Bullying in Norway. As part of this effort, Olweus developed an assessment instrument (the Olweus Bullying Questionnaire), and the Olweus Bullying Prevention Program (OBPP).

Olweus was among the first to recognize bullying as a violation of human rights. In 1994, he noted that “it is a fundamental…right for a child to feel safe in school and to be spared the oppression and repeated, intentional humiliation implied in bullying. No student should be afraid of going to school for fear of being harassed or degraded, and no parent should need to worry about such things happening to his or her child!” (Olweus, 1994, p. 1183).

Olweus was involved in other areas of bullying research, which included important research on the definition and measurement, outcomes of bullying and cyberbullying. He was actively conducting research and publishing until his death. Further, Olweus received numerous honors and awards for his work, such as the ‘Outstanding aggression research’ award by the International Society for Research on Aggression (ISRA) in 1976, the ‘Spirit of Crazy Horse’ award by the US Reclaiming Youth International organisation in 2000, the ‘Nordic Public

Health Prize’ by the Nordic Minister Council in 2002 and the Queen Sofia of Spain Medal in 2005. His pioneering research, writings, and prevention program have changed the lives of schoolchildren around the world and inspired the work of countless researchers and professionals. Less known was his talent as a jazz musician. He was active as a jazz pianist in several groups and in 2005 released the CD “Dan Olweus and Friends Play Jazz Standards.”

Olweus was survived by his wife (who subsequently died in March 2021), two daughters, and several beloved grandchildren. He also is mourned by a global family of researchers, collaborators, Olweus Bullying Prevention Program trainers, and educators in schools who will carry on his important work.