Bullying is a widespread public health problem. While its prevalence, key correlates and major health outcomes have been well researched, important gaps or controversies remain. In particular, the association between bullying and both socioeconomic status and ethnicity remains unclear. Furthermore, other areas are under-researched, such as sibling aggression and its relationship to peer bullying. Finally, while there is evidence of the adverse effects of bullying on mental health, there is still uncertainty whether any experience of being bullied, or only sustained, chronic victimisation, will lead to adverse consequences. Do those who escape bullying fare better? This thesis comprises five studies. Study 1, a meta-analysis, explored the relationship between bullying and socioeconomic status, finding victims and bully-victims, but not bullies, more often came from low socioeconomic backgrounds. Study 2 examined sibling aggression, identifying a strong homotypic association with roles taken in school bullying. Study 3 explored ethnic differences in bullying, finding ethnic minority children were not more likely to be victims, but in some cases were more often bullies. Study 4 identified individual, social and sociodemographic correlates of school bullying. Distinct profiles were observed for each bullying role. Finally, Study 5 examined the timing of bullying in relation to individual and social outcomes. Stable and concurrent victimisation was associated with more negative outcomes, while escaping bullying reduced the adverse consequences. The findings are considered in relation to ecological systems theory. Distant environmental factors, such as socioeconomic status, were only weakly associated with school bullying, while more immediate socio-ecological influences, including sibling relationships and individual characteristics, predicted victim, bully and bullyvictim roles. Further research should focus on the association with sibling aggression, and identify characteristics which can explain why some children escape being bullying, thereby limiting the adverse consequences. The findings have implications for interventions, which should take account of children’s home environments.
On 21st July during a visit to Meta in Dublin, DCUs UNESCO Chair, Prof. James O’Higgins Norman was invited to brief the Tánaiste (Deputy Prime Minister) on DCU’s FUSE Anti-Bullying and Online Safety Programme for Schools. The FUSE programme is a research based programme for primary and post-primary schools that is designed to comply with UNESCO’s Whole Education Approach to Tackling Bullying and Cyberbullying. The meeting was also attended by Darran Heaney, Director of Engagement and Innovation in DCU Anti-Bullying Centre, who outlined to the meeting how the programme was delivered to schools all over Ireland and the challenges that had to be overcome in ensuring the programme is available to all schools. FUSE was developed with financial support from Meta, Rethink Ireland, and the Department of Education.
How FUSE works
FUSE has 14 workshops designed to increase confidence in young people’s ability to identify and deal with bullying situations in person and online, either as a victim or bystander, how to take appropriate action to report these incidents and how to be safe online. It supports teachers as champions within each school, who can then educate students, fellow teachers, and parents, on how best to tackle a range of online and offline bullying issues and educate them on online safety.