Search Results for “Efficient 300-740 Flexible Learning Mode | 300-740 100% Free PDF Download 🥏 Copy URL 「 www.pdfvce.com 」 open and search for ➤ 300-740 ⮘ to download for free 🤬Valid 300-740 Mock Test”

Places Available for our Relationship Bullying Course for People with Intellectual Disabilities

We are delighted to announce an evidence based training programme called “Keeping Yourself Safe From Relationship Bullying” using the LEGO® SERIOUS PLAY® methodology.

This is a 5 week course that aims to equip people with intellectual disabilities with the necessary skills to deal with peer to peer bullying, conflict and anger. You will also learn about empathy, respect, rights and your responsibilities in keeping yourself and others happy and safe.

Training Date, Time and Venue

Start Date: 29th April 2019.

Venue: St Patricks Campus, DCU.

Time: 10am – 3pm.

Booking Details

Cost: €100 per person.

Venue: St Patrick’s Campus, Dublin City University.

Booking Steps

1. Email Geraldine Kiernan – geraldine.kiernan@dcu.ie to book a place

2. Give full details including your name, service and the number of participants that you want to book in for the course.

3. Payment can be made either by cheque or direct bank transfer.

Important Information

Please take note that this course will only run if it secures a Max number of 12 persons with intellectual disabilities. Persons with intellectual disabilities who require support to actively take part in this course will need to be accompanied by a support person.

Please contact Fiona Weldon – fiona.weldon@dcu.ie for any other queries.

Darran Heaney
Evaluating the implementation of the MindOut Social and Emotional Wellbeing Programme in Irish post-primary schools
2020
Dowling, Catherine
National University of Ireland Galway

Aims: The overarching aim of this thesis was to evaluate the implementation of the MindOut social and emotional learning (SEL) programme with disadvantaged post-primary school students (15-18 years old) in Ireland. This study was conducted in three phases, each of which have been published. Phase 1 aimed to evaluate the immediate impact of the MindOut programme on students’ social emotional skills, mental health and wellbeing and academic outcomes. Phase 2 aimed to examine variability in implementation quality and to identify factors that contributed to this variability. Phase 3 aimed to determine how implementation quality impacted on programme outcomes.

Methods: The study employed a cluster-randomised controlled design with mixed methods approaches. A total of 675 students from 32 disadvantaged schools participated at baseline and data were collected from students and teachers before, during and following programme delivery. Phase 1 employed linear mixed models (LMM) to evaluate the effectiveness of the programme on students’ outcomes. Phase 2 used process measures to determine schools’ level of implementation quality across four implementation dimensions, and to identify factors that contributed to implementation quality. Phase 3 employed LMM’s to assess the relationships between the implementation data and outcome data across three time-points and between three treatment groups (high-implementation, low-implementation and control).

Results: Phase 1 demonstrated significant improvements in students’ social and emotional skills: reduced suppression of emotions (p=0.035), use of more positive coping strategies [reduced avoidance coping p=<0.001) and increased social support coping p=0.044)] and mental health and wellbeing: reduced levels of stress (p=0.017) and depressive symptoms (p=0.030) and reduced anxiety scores for female students (p=0.044). Phase 2 detected variability in implementation quality between schools and assigned eight schools to both the high- and low-implementation groups. Influencing factors were categorised into five themes: Programme Factors, Participant Factors, Teacher Factors, School Contextual Factors and Organisational Capacity Factors. Phase 3 revealed significant positive programme effects at post-intervention for the high-implementation group only (reduced suppression of emotions [p=.049]; reduced avoidance coping [p=.006]; increased social support coping [p=.009]; reduced levels of stress [p = .035] and depressive symptoms [p = .025]. At 12-month follow-up, reduced avoidance coping [p=.033] was the only sustained outcome.

Conclusions: Overall, these findings demonstrate that the MindOut programme can be effective in producing positive outcomes for participants, particularly those students of disadvantaged status. However, these positive outcomes were only evident in schools that implemented the programme with high-quality, signifying the importance of implementation quality in the overall success of a programme. The findings from this study have clear implications for policy, practice and future research and highlight a number of important factors to enhance implementation quality and strengthen programme outcomes.

‘I can breathe, finally’: pasts, presents and (imagined) futures of working-class young women and girls engaged in beauty education
2020
Walters, Hannah
University of Glasgow

This thesis examines the social and educational experiences of working-class young women and girls engaged in vocational beauty education in the West of Scotland, with research taking place at three further education colleges. Through qualitative interviews with staff and students, supplemented with classroom observations, the pasts, presents and (imagined) futures of working-class girls are explored.

Taking a feminist-Bourdieusian theoretical approach, the school experiences of working-class girls are identified as a central driver for economic and educational inequalities later in life, with school having been experienced as a space of ‘networks of violence’ relating to fights, bullying and complicated, often hostile, relationships. These inequalities include the structuring of post-compulsory educational pathways which are highly gendered and classed, intergenerationally reproducing working-class women’s disadvantage. At the same time, and contrary to the ways in which vocational education tends to be criticised from both skills-based and feminist perspectives, the thesis (re-)examines beauty education in terms of valuable opportunities for social capital, and ‘use-value’, highlighting the creative, meaningful aspects of beauty education for working-class girls. Finally, participants’ imagined futures are examined. In particular, it is argued that uncertainty represents a key theme of discussions around imagined futures, which manifests as curbed ambitions based on current economic positions and class- and gender-informed plausibility structures. This final findings chapter also examines both the enduring power of the local habitus, as well as its evolution and reconfiguration, through participants’ narratives of aspirations, resistance and meaningful work.

In doing so, the thesis mobilises Bourdieusian concepts of violence (through the application of ‘networks of violence’); habitus and dialectical confrontation; and capital, as a means by which to explore working-class girls’ educational and social experiences, as well as their imagined futures and what structures these. In particular, it will be argued that the local (working-class, feminine) habitus of the participants of this study was in conflict with the institutional habitus of the school, yet aligned well with the institutional habitus at work in beauty learning spaces. The interplay of participants’ local habitus and its evolution is then explored in terms of how this tension impacts imagined futures for working-class girls.

Overall, this thesis contributes to contemporary discussions regarding the function of both class and gender in informing inequalities at work under late modernity, including the structuring of post-16 educational options, and transitions to work for young people. It also contributes to theoretical debates around the application of the ‘institutional habitus’, widening these discussions to include empirically-informed notions of institutional and local habitus alignment. Finally, and building on the work of feminist Bourdieusian scholars, this project contributes empirical data to theoretical discussions of value, in particular the notion of ‘use- value’ and its function for working-class young women and girls.

Continued Professional Development for Educators

Continued Professional Development for Educators

Bullying Prevention and Intervention Online Course

Course LeaderDr Seline Keating, DCU Anti-Bullying Centre (ABC)

Format: Blended – delivered over a 10-week period: includes one on campus facilitation skills workshop

We offer a Bullying Prevention and Intervention Course which is also included under DCU’s Partnership for Learning: Programme of Continuing Professional Development (CPD) for Cooperating Schools. This course is most suitable for school principals and teachers, but it may be beneficial to youth workers, social workers, healthcare professionals and those interested in bullying prevention and intervention in educational settings.

The course is designed and delivered by Dr. Seline Keating. It is an online course with one compulsory face-to-face workshop. Participants have ten weeks to complete the online component of the course, at their own pace. The face-to-face workshop takes place on a Saturday, usually in week 4 of the course (9:30-1:30pm) in DCU Institute of Education, St. Patrick’s Campus, Drumcondra.

The course content comprises of the following topics:

  • Defining Bullying (e.g. cyberbullying, identity-based bullying)
  • Victims, Bullies and “The Bullying Circle”
  • Consequences of Bullying
  • DE (2022) Cinéaltas: Action Plan on Bullying; Implementation Plan (2023)
  • DE Circulars and Procedures
  • Nuts+Bolts: An Anti-Bullying Policy Reflective Framework
  • Bullying Prevention and intervention strategies
  • School’s Role/Teacher’s Role/Parents’ Role
  • Bullying Resources, Methodologies and Support
Email and the subversion of organisational culture
2012
Freke, David Roy
University of Leicester

Email is, in the early part of the 21st century, an integral part of organisational life. Its centrality has resulted in it being more than a mere organisational process. Rather, email represents a vehicle by which organisational culture develops. Using concepts of “email communities” and “insider-outsider social habitus” statuses, this phenomenon is explored through evocative ethnography and is found to be both benign and malign. Issues of alternative hierarchies, bullying, inclusion and exclusion emerge. These issues are characterised by a lack of awareness of the effects of their actions on the part of protagonists. Because the protagonists’ actions are not usually deliberate, those suffering the effects doubt the validity of their experiences and feelings. From the organisational perspective, official notions of organisational culture and organisational values are compromised or even rendered irrelevant. This in turn compromises the honesty and integrity of organisations in respect of the ways in which they present themselves to their employees and the outside world. Organisations, however, are largely unaware of these effects as the insider-outsider social habitus concept does not engage with the structural culture-as-an-entity understanding favoured by organisations. Remedies, examined within the compass of organisational learning and knowledge management are explored, with a need for remedies within both concepts being found to be necessary, together with a need for emotional intelligence.

Children’s, parents’, peers’ and professionals’ experiences of language impairment: a multi-perspective study to identify psychosocial goals for intervention
2014
Hambly, H.
University of the West of England, Bristol

Children with language impairment (LI) can experience a wide range of social and emotional difficulties in addition to linguistic difficulties, but there is limited understanding about how LI impacts on these broader, psychosocial aspects of children’s lives. Furthermore, psychosocial outcomes for children are not assessed routinely in speech and language therapy research and practice. Studies of experiences of disability and impairment in other areas have highlighted the importance of addressing the psychosocial beyond the medical. This study draws on interpretive phenomenological analysis (IPA) to explore children’s, parents’, peers’ and professionals’ experiences of children’s LI. Using a phenomenological methodology to explore LI from multiple-perspectives, the study sought to uncover psychosocial features of LI and identify goals for support. Four children, aged 8-10 yrs with a diagnosis of LI, were interviewed about their experiences using arts-based methods. Children’s parents, teachers, learning support assistants, speech and language therapists and siblings and/or friends were also interviewed. Analysis of the 22 interviews is presented as four case studies that include each perspective around the child. Themes were identified through coding and analysing within and across cases. A second stage literature review was undertaken to understand, theorise and discuss emerging themes. Analysis revealed three themes: Agency, Understandings and Misunderstandings, and Making Sense of Difference. Children’s experiences of agency were associated with their emotions and their engagement in classroom and social activities, and not always dependent on their communication abilities. Children with LI often had different understandings of others’ intentions, situations and instructions to that of their peers, professionals and parents. Mismatches in understandings were associated with children being considered unusual, immature, egocentric or rude by others, impacting on their risk for bullying and social exclusion. There were divergent experiences and understanding of LI. Interpretations included impaired speech, language and social communication; social and emotional immaturity; parental neglect; and other people’s attitudes and behaviours. For children, LI was predominantly relational, that is, it was mainly experienced in relationship with others. Psychosocial goals for intervention include addressing attitudes, understandings and behaviours of professionals and peers towards children, in addition to children’s understanding and use of language; promoting children’s experience of agency; and addressing children’s emotional wellbeing and risk for bullying. Good communication and understanding between children, families and professionals is essential for intervention.

ABC GEM Project Meeting, DCU

Dr. Seline Keating (Principal Investigator) and Dr. Bernie Collins, associates of the National Anti-Bullying Research and Resource Centre (ABC) hosted consortium partners from Greece, Italy, Netherlands and Spain to Belvedere House, on the DCU St. Patrick’s Campus to commence their work on GEM: Gender Equality Matters.

 

Prof. James O’Higgins Norman welcome GEM project partners to DCU.

 

Seline and Bernie were recently awarded a grant of €460,000 from the EU Rights, Equality and Citizenship (REC) Programme to lead a transnational project on gender-based violence. The project, titled GEM: Gender Equality Matters, identifies three target groups with whom they will work over a two year period: children (aged 10-17); parents, and teachers.

Key objectives include raising awareness, challenging attitudes and promoting behaviour changes in relation to gender-based violence generally, and with specific reference to violence perpetrated against the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex (LGBTI) community.

The main activities include in-school and online training courses for school staffs and parents, classroom materials for students in upper primary and secondary schools and a capstone conference to share learning from the project. There will be also a number of publications to present significant findings from the research element of the project. A number of public events are also planned across consortium countries.

This exciting work will be undertaken with partners from Italy (FMD); Spain (University of Murcia); Greece (KMOP) and Netherlands (ESHA).

UNESCO Chair at OECD Policy Forum for a Shift in Anti-Bullying Strategies

In a significant address at the 11th Policy Forum on Education for Inclusive Societies held by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Prof. James O’Higgins Norman, the DCU UNESCO Chair on Bullying and Cyberbullying, underscored the pressing need to reevaluate traditional methods of combating bullying in educational environments. During his presentation, Prof. O’Higgins Norman illuminated the dual toll of bullying, focusing on both the human suffering it causes and its considerable economic impacts.

Drawing upon the latest recommendations from UNESCO, Prof. O’Higgins Norman advocated for a departure from the prevalent whole school approaches to anti-bullying. He stressed the importance of adopting the Whole Education Approach, a strategy UNESCO recommended in 2020, as a more effective means to address this pervasive issue. This innovative approach encourages the integration of anti-bullying measures across all aspects of the educational experience, rather than confining them to individual schools or age groups.

Highlighting the economic implications, Prof. O’Higgins Norman presented compelling evidence of the financial costs associated with failing to tackle bullying effectively. The economic burden, he noted, stems not only from the immediate effects of bullying on student well-being and academic achievement but also from the long-term societal costs related to healthcare, social services, and lost productivity.

The address by Prof. O’Higgins Norman at the OECD forum represents a critical call to action for policymakers, educators, and stakeholders across the globe. By shifting towards a Whole Education Approach to bullying, there is a significant opportunity not only to alleviate the personal hardships faced by countless students but also to mitigate the economic strains on societies worldwide.

As nations grapple with the challenges of fostering inclusive and supportive educational environments, the insights shared by Prof. O’Higgins Norman offer a valuable blueprint for meaningful progress. The forum served as a pivotal platform for exchanging ideas and strategies, reinforcing the collective commitment to creating safer and more welcoming spaces for learning.

Forensic Linguistics and Workplace bullying

ABC welcomed Prof. Victoria Guillén Nieto from the University of Alicante and Prof. Dieter A. Stein from Heinrich-Heine Universitӓt who gave a seminar on Forensic Linguistics and how they may be used in workplace bullying cases.

Within the framework of forensic linguistics, e.g. an applied branch of linguistics that is concerned with the scientific study of evidential language, this talk focused on a particular type of language crime, “mobbing in the workplace”, also referred to as “workplace bullying”. “Mobbing in the workplace” refers to the systematic succession of acts of hostile and unethical communication, which one or a few individuals maliciously direct over a significant period towards a targeted person, designed to secure the removal from the organisation of the victim, who experiences a profound sense of shame and powerlessness (Leyman, 1990). The foundational research on this phenomenon expanded in the 1990s with the work of German-Swedish psychologist Leyman (1990; Leymann & Gustafsson, 1996).

Since then, because of the worldwide interest in the topic, a considerable body of research has been developed in multiple fields, such as social psychology, sociology, conflict resolution, law, nursing, medicine, traumatology, and occupational health, to name the major disciplines involved up to now (Duffy & Sperry, 2012: 23). On reviewing the literature, however, one major weakness stands out. Specifically, no dedicated specifically linguistic research exists in the analysis of mobbing.

The aim of the talk was to present current research in progress concerning the characterisation of “mobbing in the workplace” activity from the theoretical point of view of modern theory of genre (Levinson 1979: 365-399; Biber 1995; Giltrow & Stein 2009). Prof Nieto and Prof Stein’s research takes a closer look at the surface side and tries to identify less abstract, surface based elements of cohesion, with a view to identifying linguistic structures that may be indicators or diagnostic symptoms for describing and recognizing a macro-act of mobbing. The linguistic analysis is data based. For purposes of analysis, a short selection of relevant cases of mobbing will serve as a basis to draw some generalising statements about the linguistic cohesive principles operating in mobbing as a specific type of genre involving the malicious use of language. Their research may contribute to shed new light on the study of workplace bullying from the linguistic theory of genre, as well as to provide the administration, and especially courts, with strong linguistic evidence when it is already too late to prevent the offence.