There has been an abundance of studies that have adopted positivist approaches, employing quantitative methods, to research OCD ‘symptoms’ and their underlying neurobiology and neurochemistry. There appears to be a lack of research investigating how OCD is experienced by those living with the diagnosis, and in particular the experiences of young people diagnosed with OCD. Ten young people, aged 14-17 years old, with a diagnosis of OCD were recruited from Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS). The young people were interviewed and a Thematic Analysis (TA) was used to analyse data. Four themes were developed through the analysis. The first theme ‘Traumatic and stressful life events’ found that 9 out of the 10 participants experienced at least one of the following three life events just prior to the development of their OCD: ‘Hostility in the family’, ‘Illness and death’, ‘Bullying and friendlessness’. Four subthemes, ‘Lack of understanding of the behaviour’, ‘Being secretive’, ‘I thought I was going crazy’, and ‘Feeling different’, provided a richer understanding to the theme ‘Responses to signs of OCD’. The four subthemes ‘Feeling “right”‘, ‘I was taking on all the responsibility’, ‘It’s ruined everything’, ‘Everyday life is now in my bedroom’ explored the third theme ‘The battle of living with OCD’. The last theme ‘Ambivalent relationship to help’ described the conflict that most participants had over exposure therapy and accommodation of their OCD. Lastly, most participants felt the long waiting time for help was frustrating. The theme is fully explored by the following three subthemes: ‘Conflicts of exposure therapy’, ‘Conflicts about accommodation of the OCD’, and ‘Frustrations of long waiting lists’. The themes that emerged may provide important information for clinicians and the implications of the research findings are discussed. The strengths and limitations of the study are noted and there are suggestions for future research.
Search Results for “Efficient 300-740 Flexible Learning Mode | 300-740 100% Free PDF Download 🥏 Copy URL 「 www.pdfvce.com 」 open and search for ➤ 300-740 ⮘ to download for free 🤬Valid 300-740 Mock Test”
This research is a qualitative study of bully/victim problems in one secondary school where the main methods of data collection were interviews, observations, the draw and write technique and documentary analysis, with quantitative methods, such as questionnaires, used only when they would contribute to an understanding of the context of the case. The main aim of this study was to explore the factors which influenced the success of one secondary school’s efforts to combat bully/victim problems. The key research questions underlying this research focus were: (i) How do students and teachers define and interpret bullying behaviour? (ii) What factors influence how, when and to whom students report bullying? (iii) In what ways do teachers respond and what factors influence their responses? This study contributes to our understanding about bully/victim problems in two main ways. First, it makes a methodological contribution. The study was based in one secondary school and this type of in-depth, qualitative study is unusual in research in this area. Consequently, the experiences of the researcher may help to inform the design of future studies using this method. Second, it identifies a number of findings which may be important in combating bully/victim problems within schools. First, the study suggests that the student definition and the teacher definition of bullying appears to evolve over time and to be both interactive and interdependent. Second, the term ‘bullying’ was found to evoke a stereotypical image which appears to be unhelpful in both reporting and responding to bullying. Third, students appear to have expectations of those they report bullying to which may not be realised and that the success of any response is based upon the student’s perceptions of how well that person meets their expectations. Fourth, students are more likely to report bullying to a female senior member of staff, believing them to be most able to fulfil their needs. Finally, the response of teachers to reports or incidents of bullying appears to be influenced by a variety of issues including gender, previous personal experience of being bullied and professional experience.
Yesterday, Facebook and the National Anti-Bullying Research and Resource Centre (ABC) at DCU launch a three-year partnership which will see an anti-bullying and online safety training programme offered to every post-primary school in Ireland.
Supported by Facebook leading ABC experts will offer this training and research programme to teachers and parents of 12 – 17-year-old students across the country. Through face-to-face workshops and online modules, participants will be equipped with the tools to identify and understand bullying and develop the skills to support students when it comes to online safety.
Speaking at the launch, Professor James O’Higgins Norman, ABC Director and UNESCO Chair on Tackling Bullying in Schools and Cyberspace said,
In a study we conducted in 2017, school principals cited a lack of time and resources available to train teachers and the need for additional support as the main challenges in tackling bullying and online safety in schools. Through this partnership we are aiming to deliver much-needed training in tackling bullying and online safety for both teachers and parents in schools nationwide. By adopting a train-the-trainer approach this programme will empower teachers and parents to further educate whole-school communities in bullying, cyberbullying and online safety issues.
Upon completion of this programme, parents and teachers will be able to:
● Define and identify bullying, cyberbullying, and online safety;
● Engage empathically with children and young people;
● Investigate and resolve reported incidents;
● Teach children and adolescents how to nurture respectful relationships, and develop better communication skills offline and online; and
● Support colleagues in strengthening their abilities to educate young people about bullying, cyberbullying, and online safety.
Julie de Bailliencourt, Facebook Global Safety Policy Manager commented: “We are delighted to support the work of the National Anti-Bullying Centre through this partnership. Making sure people feel safe when they come to Facebook is our most important responsibility, especially when it comes to young people. Through partnerships like this one, we know we can all better tackle the issue of bullying, whether offline or online.
Over the last 14 years, we have built and continued to improve our safety policies and reporting processes and we want everybody who uses Facebook to feel safe and supported when they connect online with their friends and family. Over the three years of this initiative, we aim to help teachers and parents understand the complexities of bullying and develop the skills to support students when it comes to online safety.
The programme, which is scheduled to begin in January 2019, will be offered to an estimated 800 post primary schools across Ireland and will operate within the framework of the Department of Education & Skills recently published Wellbeing Policy for schools and the Government’s Action Plan for Online Safety. It is also designed to support the implementation of the Government’s Action Plan on Bullying (2013) and will be delivered to teachers with support from the Association of Teachers’ Education Centres in Ireland.
Commenting on the partnership, DCU President Professor Brian MacCraith said:
This partnership between Facebook and the National Anti-Bullying Research and Resource Centre at DCU is an excellent initiative and will have a profound impact on the lives of thousands of students and their families. I welcome the fact that the focus is on providing training for teachers and parents who are both faced with the growing challenge of supporting students dealing with all the complexities and dangers associated with bullying, cyberbullying, and online safety. The award of the prestigious UNESCO Chair on Tackling Bullying in Cyberspace and Schools earlier this year is a measure of the global scale of the problem and of the expertise developed by Prof. O’Higgins and his team. This project is an excellent manifestation of the public good that can derive from that.
John Church, CEO of the ISPCC also supported the partnership, saying, The ISPCC is delighted to support this new evidence-based schools’ programme to be delivered by Dublin City University and funded by Facebook. Through our work with children and young people, the ISPCC is acutely aware of how bullying and online safety issues can impact upon a young person’s life, their self-esteem and their ability to grow. These issues are not something that any person, but particularly any child or young person, should ever have to experience.
Adding, The Action Plan on Bullying requires schools to address the issue of bullying across their entire school community, while the first National Action Plan for Online Safety highlights the need for improved online safety education for all. This approach in the delivery of the programme is very much welcome – children, parents, teachers and the wider school community all have an important role to play in tackling bullying and helping children and young people to stay safe online.
Teachers play a critical role in responding to, reporting, and preventing bullying. This study focuses on teachers’ perceptions of various types of bullying: physical, verbal, relational, and especially the more recent phenomenon of cyberbullying. It compares English and US teachers’ perspectives of the seriousness of these different types of bullying, thereby investigating how and why teachers have different views of how to address bullying and the different reasons they give as to why they would or would not respond to different bullying scenarios. This can possibly contribute to potential strategies to combat bullying.
The research is based on a sequential explanatory mixed methods design. In the first quantitative phase, the researcher developed two questionnaires, asking teachers for their perceptions of different hypothetical bullying scenarios, drawing on Expectancy Theory and Social Cognitive Theory. Questionnaires were adapted from those previously developed in a series of American studies (Bauman and Del Rio 2006; Yoon and Kerber 2003; Stauffer et al. 2012). They were administered to a purposive sample of teachers in both England and the US in order to provide a comparative element in two English-speaking country contexts. The questionnaires were analysed to establish whether there are differences between the perceptions and the reasons for responses for new and experienced teachers across the two different country contexts. The analyses also explored teacher perceptions of more long-term strategies to deal with cyberbullying.
In the second qualitative phase, a series of semi-structured interviews were conducted with small sub samples of teachers in both England and the US to provide additional qualitative evidence about teachers’ understandings and experiences of bullying. The interviews explored a number of topics emerging from the quantitative findings pertaining to bullying and cyberbullying, allowing teachers to comment on the survey findings and share their experiences. In addition, the analysis of the qualitative interviews offered the opportunity to provide richer descriptions and insights, building explanations and enhancing understandings. This process enables the research to investigate the degree of similarity between the quantitative and qualitative findings. The combination and integration of findings from both phases of the mixed methods study adds to the ability to triangulate findings and to explore and clarify the reasons for differences in perspectives between English and US teachers. In the mixed sequential explanatory strategy, quantitative findings reveal general trends from the data that are later expanded and investigated further within the qualitative phase. The discussion then explores the nature of the similarities and differences between these findings.
The quantitative findings suggest that three main variables predicted both US and English teachers’ responses to cyberbullying scenarios: the perceived seriousness of the situation, the confidence in one’s ability, and the location (home having less of a response than school scenarios). The qualitative findings suggest that teachers’ perceptions of severity could be shaped by current policies and the relationships teachers developed with their students; the perceived confidence in one’s self could be mediated by one’s interpretation of the school culture and the trust established with others on staff; responding to a home cyberbullying situation could depend on one’s understanding of pastoral responsibilities and the current parental involvement. This research provides new findings that can inform policy makers and practitioners in designing and implementing anti-bullying programs that are relevant to different contexts. Knowledge of teacher perceptions could prove useful as a starting point for developing a teacher education program. An understanding of the different types of bullying and cyberbullying that need attention could enable anti-bullying programs to present new and relevant material.
My inquiry sits within the reflective paradigm. I start from an understanding that knowing myself better will enhance my capacity for good action in the world. Through questioning myself and writing myself on to the page, I trace how I resist community formations, while simultaneously wanting to be in community with others. This paradox has its roots in my multiple experiences of being bullied, and finds transformation in my stubborn refusal to retreat into disconnection. I notice the way bullying is part of my fabric. I trace my resistance to these experiences in my embodied experience of connecting to others, through a form of shape-changing. I see how question-forming is both an expression of my own bullying tendencies, and an intention to overcome them. Through my connection to others and my curiosity, I form a networked community in which I can work in the world as a network coordinator, action-researcher, activist and evaluator. I show how my approach to this work is rooted in the values of compassion, love, and fairness, and inspired by art. I hold myself to account in relation to these values, as living standards by which I judge myself and my action in the world. This finds expression in research that helps us to design more appropriate criteria for the evaluation of international social change networks. Through this process I inquire with others into the nature of networks, and their potential for supporting us in lightly-held communities which liberate us to be dynamic, diverse and creative individuals working together for common purpose. I tentatively conclude that networks have the potential to increase my and our capacity for love. Through this research I am developing new ways of knowing about what we are doing as reflective practitioners, and by what standards we can invite others to judge our work. I am, through my practice, making space for us to flourish, as individuals and communities. In this way I use the energy released by my response to bullying in the service of transformation.
ABC welcomed Prof. Victoria Guillén Nieto from the University of Alicante and Prof. Dieter A. Stein from Heinrich-Heine Universitӓt who gave a seminar on Forensic Linguistics and how they may be used in workplace bullying cases.
Within the framework of forensic linguistics, e.g. an applied branch of linguistics that is concerned with the scientific study of evidential language, this talk focused on a particular type of language crime, “mobbing in the workplace”, also referred to as “workplace bullying”. “Mobbing in the workplace” refers to the systematic succession of acts of hostile and unethical communication, which one or a few individuals maliciously direct over a significant period towards a targeted person, designed to secure the removal from the organisation of the victim, who experiences a profound sense of shame and powerlessness (Leyman, 1990). The foundational research on this phenomenon expanded in the 1990s with the work of German-Swedish psychologist Leyman (1990; Leymann & Gustafsson, 1996).
Since then, because of the worldwide interest in the topic, a considerable body of research has been developed in multiple fields, such as social psychology, sociology, conflict resolution, law, nursing, medicine, traumatology, and occupational health, to name the major disciplines involved up to now (Duffy & Sperry, 2012: 23). On reviewing the literature, however, one major weakness stands out. Specifically, no dedicated specifically linguistic research exists in the analysis of mobbing.
The aim of the talk was to present current research in progress concerning the characterisation of “mobbing in the workplace” activity from the theoretical point of view of modern theory of genre (Levinson 1979: 365-399; Biber 1995; Giltrow & Stein 2009). Prof Nieto and Prof Stein’s research takes a closer look at the surface side and tries to identify less abstract, surface based elements of cohesion, with a view to identifying linguistic structures that may be indicators or diagnostic symptoms for describing and recognizing a macro-act of mobbing. The linguistic analysis is data based. For purposes of analysis, a short selection of relevant cases of mobbing will serve as a basis to draw some generalising statements about the linguistic cohesive principles operating in mobbing as a specific type of genre involving the malicious use of language. Their research may contribute to shed new light on the study of workplace bullying from the linguistic theory of genre, as well as to provide the administration, and especially courts, with strong linguistic evidence when it is already too late to prevent the offence.
While relational networks have been an important part of much research into human interaction since at least the 1980s, there has been little research into network creation and decay, with much research simply creating a snapshot of an established network. Additionally, only a small number of studies have portrayed networks as dynamic and changing, instead viewing ties as binary, either strong or weak, but not something in between.
This thesis addresses both these problems using intercultural business email data to map relationships from the first introduction of two parties, to eventual decay, including stages of change along the way. A comprehensive model of dynamic relational networks is also presented, adding significant detail to the descriptions presented by prior studies, and presenting the idea graphically for the first time. The thesis uses a corpus of 1072 emails sent between a sole trader and 19 of her clients. Initially, an exploratory data analysis is conducted to present some of the structural and statistical aspects of the data. Then, using an inductive qualitative research process, tie creation is examined looking at how relationships are initiated and begin to progress. How strong functional ties are developed is then examined through linguistic strategies such as self-disclosures, multimedia sharing, and paying compliments. A systematic analysis of the usage of CMC (computer mediated communication) cues for relational work is given particular attention. The maintenance of weak ties is also examined, including using politic behaviour, adherence to one’s line, and recipient design. Tie decay, an under-explored area, is also analysed by describing how language differs before and after a break in contact, how a relationship can be destabilised and (possibly) repaired, or how it may become dysfunctional.
It is found that traits put forward by prior studies categorising relationships as strong, e.g., homophily, time dedication and trust, can be exemplified through linguistic elements in those relationships which are moving towards being strong (and, importantly, functional i.e., friendly, rather than dysfunctional, i.e., bullying). The thesis also shows how in all the business relationships presented, there is some amount of relational communication, which is important for ensuring a smooth business relationship.
On June 14, 2024, DCU Anti-Bullying Centre hosted a significant event marking the culmination of the Erasmus+ funded BeFore project. This initiative focuses on improving educational training programs for coaches, trainers, teachers, and managers to enhance their skills in dealing with bullying, particularly in sporting contexts. The project has developed a comprehensive, far-reaching, and interdisciplinary online course offering evidence-informed insights on preventing and responding to bullying.
The event began with a presentation by the BeFore team, showcasing the main outcome of the project: the BeFore online training course on anti-bullying in sports. This was followed by keynote presentations from esteemed national and international experts in the field of inclusion in sport.
Declan O’Leary, Head of Coaching Services in Sport Ireland, was the first keynote speaker. He provided insights into evidence-informed inclusive coaching practices. Dr. Gus Ryrie of Liverpool John Moores University followed with a detailed discussion on developing contextually relevant coach research beyond practice, emphasising the need for co-creation and effective dissemination. The final presentation was delivered by Dr. Elisa Bisagno from the University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy, who spoke on ‘Can Coaches do the Trick? Psycho-educational Guidelines to Promote Inclusive Sports Environments’.
The event was well received by a passionate and enthusiastic audience, comprising academics, sports organisations, policymakers, and members of various sporting communities. Key takeaways from the event included the importance of disseminating key evidence to relevant sports coaches and the necessity of developing strong relationships between academics and sporting bodies to foster inclusive and supportive environments in sports. The event left attendees motivated and equipped with new strategies to combat bullying in their respective fields.
Within this thesis the challenge of reducing bullying among children and adolescents in schools is reviewed (Chapter 2). The focus of this research was to examine the developmental decline in prosocial bystander responses to bullying (when a “bystander” is an individual who witnesses the bullying incident). To do so, a “developmental intergroup approach” (cf. Killen, Mulvey & Hitti, 2013; Rutland, Killen & Abrams, 2010) was applied to the context of bystander intentions. This approach suggests that intergroup factors such as group membership and identification, group norms, intergroup status and social-moral reasoning influence attitudes and behaviours during childhood and adolescence (e.g., Abrams, Rutland & Cameron, 2003; Rutland & Killen, 2011; Chapter 3). The present research examines whether this approach could shed light on why, with age, children become less likely to report helpful bystander intentions when faced with bullying and aggression among peers (e.g., Rigby & Johnson, 2006). Three studies were conducted, following an experimental questionnaire-based design (e.g., Abrams, Palmer, Rutland, Cameron & Van de Vyver, 2013; Nesdale & Lawson, 2011; Chapter 4). Study 1 (Chapter 5) showed support for examining group membership and group identification, group norms and social-moral reasoning) when understanding the developmental decline in helpful bystander responses. Two hundred and sixty 8-10 year olds and 13-15 year olds read about an incident of intergroup verbal aggression. Adolescent bystander intentions were influenced by norms and perceived severity of the incident. A significant moderated mediation analysis showed that the level of group identification among participants partially mediated the relationship between age and helpful bystander intentions, but only when the aggressor was an outgroup member and the victim was an ingroup member. Moral (e.g., “It’s not right to call them names”) and psychological (e.g., “It’s none of my business) reasoning differed by age and intention to help the victim or not. In Study 2 (Chapter 6) the role of intergroup bystander status and type of bystander response was manipulated. Two types of bystander norm (attitudinal and behavioural) were measured along with an exploratory examination of perceived leadership. Participants (N=221) read about an incident of verbal aggression where a bystander (who belonged to a high- or low-status group), either helped or walked away from an incident of verbal aggression. Helping bystanders were viewed more positively than those who walked away, but no effect of status on bystander evaluations was observed. However, moral reasoning was prioritised for high-status compared to low-status bystanders, regardless of their bystander behaviour. Additionally, bystander response (but not status) moderated the relationship between the behavioural norm and perceived leadership qualities. To further examine the role of norms a norm for helping versus not getting involved was manipulated in Study 3 (Chapter 7). Participants (N=230) read about deviant ingroup and outgroup bystanders who observed an incident of intergroup verbal aggression. Group membership was either school group or ethnicity (ingroup British and outgroup Travellers). Not only were participants sensitive to the group membership of the bystander, but they evaluated those who transgressed a helping norm more negatively than those who transgressed a norm not to get involved. Importantly this study also showed, for the first time, that children and adolescents are aware of group-based repercussions (e.g., social exclusion) if they do not behave in line with group norms. The studies presented within this thesis show strong support for considering group processes when examining the developmental decline in bystander responses to bullying and aggression and developing age-appropriate anti-bullying interventions. Further implications for theory, practitioners, policy and future research are discussed (see Chapter 8).
There has been a lot of recent media coverage of, and research that has drawn attention to, the increase in reporting of workplace bullying (WPB) and harassment in the National Health Service (NHS). These reports have indicated that this culture of bullying has impacted on the quality of care for service users (Francis, 2013). The first aim of this research was to understand the lived experiences of WPB or harassment in the NHS and to examine the dynamics of power that construct the bullying relationship at different levels; the institutional
level (macro level), the workplace (meso level) and at the individual level (micro level). The second aim was to understand how employees are both affected by, and resist power. The potential for resistance in an organisation could be used to expand knowledge in the counselling psychology profession (CPP) at the level of both research and intervention. This is an area that the CPP is well able to support. Therapists and Healthcare Professionals (HCP), who had left the NHS, were recruited from WPB websites and word of mouth and invited to
attend a narrative interview. All were from different parts of the UK, representing varied NHS healthcare settings. Therapists and HCP were chosen because they are situated at the interface of the competing institutional systems that often reproduce bullying cultures, whilst at the same time could be facing the challenges of offering therapy to some service users who could be experiencing the same thing. Narratives were transcribed and analysed using narrative inquiry (NI) and a Foucauldian Discourse Analysis (FDA) as these allowed a
deepening of an analysis of power at different levels. WPB and harassment manifested as discrimination, such as one narrator who was not offered a senior post for being black and challenging, whilst at other times this was impersonal, such as the general pressure of not conforming to workplace standards, such as working overtime, manifesting in group ganging. Whilst racism manifested as a visible, personal and humiliating attack, WPB experienced by the white narrators tended to be job related where the main threat was being made invisible in the service. All the narratives indicated how WPB and harassment reproduced normative structures in NHS workplace cultures that often discriminated against difference. They also revealed that not only were the narrators subject to WPB and harassment at an individual level, but this was also manifested through the organisation and institutionally, as racism and sexual discrimination. In summary, these findings indicated strongly that ‘the personal’ is indeed, ‘political’. Implications and recommendation for the counselling psychology profession were made and expanded upon.